Skip to main content
Back to Resources
Quick Reference

CNC Axis Type Comparison Table

3-axis vs 4-axis vs 5-axis capabilities, applications, and cost comparison

Overview

CNC machines are classified by the number of axes they can move simultaneously. Each additional axis increases complexity, capability, and cost. This guide compares 3-axis, 4-axis, and 5-axis configurations based on ISO 230-1 geometric accuracy standards.

Capability Overview

3FACES3-Axis

Access: 3 Faces

Top + 2 sides (requires repositioning)

4FACES4-Axis

Access: 4 Faces

360° rotation + top (one setup)

5+FACES5-Axis

Access: All Faces

Complete part in single setup

Detailed Specification Comparison

Feature3-Axis4-Axis5-Axis
Motion AxesX, Y, Z (linear)X, Y, Z + A (rotary)X, Y, Z + A, B (rotary)
Simultaneous Axes34 (3+1 or full 4)5 (full simultaneous)
Positioning Accuracy (ISO 230-2)±0.005-0.01mm±0.008-0.015mm±0.01-0.02mm
Setup ComplexityLowMediumHigh
Typical Machine Cost$30K-$100K$80K-$200K$150K-$500K+
Programming DifficultyBeginnerIntermediateAdvanced
Cycle Time (Complex Parts)Baseline (100%)70-85%50-70%
Undercut Access❌ Limited⚠️ Partial✅ Full

3-Axis Applications

  • ✓ Flat parts and plates
  • ✓ Simple 2.5D milling
  • ✓ Drilling and tapping
  • ✓ Engraving and marking
  • ✓ Prototyping
  • ✓ Sheet metal cutting

4-Axis Applications

  • ✓ Cylindrical parts
  • ✓ Cams and gears
  • ✓ Rotary engraving
  • ✓ Continuous edge milling
  • ✓ Helical surfaces
  • ✓ Reduced setups (2-3 sides)

5-Axis Applications

  • ✓ Aerospace components
  • ✓ Complex molds & dies
  • ✓ Medical implants
  • ✓ Turbine blades
  • ✓ Single-setup machining
  • ✓ Sculptured surfaces

ROI Considerations

When to Upgrade from 3-Axis to 4-Axis

  • High-volume cylindrical parts: Payback in 12-18 months through reduced setups
  • Multiple-sided machining: 30-50% cycle time reduction
  • Improved accuracy: Single-setup eliminates repositioning errors

When to Invest in 5-Axis

  • Complex geometry requirements: Parts that would require 4+ setups on 3-axis
  • Aerospace/medical sectors: High-value parts justify equipment cost
  • Tool life improvement: Optimal tool approach angles extend tool life 40-60%
  • Competitive advantage: Capability to quote jobs competitors cannot handle

Typical Payback Periods

3-Axis → 4-Axis12-24 months
12m
24m
Investment: +$50K-$100K
3-Axis → 5-Axis18-36 months
18m
36m
Investment: +$120K-$400K
4-Axis → 5-Axis24-48 months
24m
48m
Investment: +$70K-$300K
Fastest ROI
Moderate ROI
Longer ROI

Quick Decision Guide

Choose 3-Axis if:

• Mainly flat or 2.5D parts
• Budget under $100K
• No complex undercuts required
• Operators have basic CNC skills

Choose 4-Axis if:

• Regular cylindrical or rotary parts
• Need to reduce multi-setup operations
• Budget $80K-$200K
• Experienced operators available

Choose 5-Axis if:

• Complex 3D surfaces and undercuts
• Aerospace, medical, or mold/die work
• Single-setup capability crucial
• Budget $150K+ and skilled programmers

Use Our Calculators

Calculate the financial impact of upgrading your CNC configuration: